食品科学高被引论文计量分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作研究项目(71561147001); “十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0500); 湖北省技术创新专项(2018ADC107)


A Bibliometric Study on Highly Cited Papers of Food Science
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解食品科学学科的研究现状,基于文献计量学视角,对2009—2018年食品科学学科高被引论文的文献总量、发文国家、研究机构、来源期刊与研究热点进行分析。结果显示:我国在食品科学学科高被引论文数已位居全球第一,然而,从总被引次数和篇均被引次数看,我国高被引论文的影响力和质量与美国存在较大差距,我国在高被引论文国际科技合作网络中的影响力也远不及美国。在入选高被引论文数排名前20的科研机构中,中国的机构虽占据最多(5席),但各机构同样存在总被引次数和篇均被引次数偏低的现象。当前食品科学学科的发展呈现多学科交叉融合态势,全球范围内的研究热点主要集中在食品有效组分的生物活性及作用机理、新型营养成分递送系统(微胶囊、纳米胶囊、乳液体系)、肠道微生物、成分的稳定性、食品包装和货架期等方面。中美之间以及中国的优势研究机构之间研究领域有明显不同且各具特色。

    Abstract:

    For a better understanding of the existing condition of food science discipline, a bibliometrics approach was used to analyze the publication amount, countries/ territories, institutes, source journals and the research hotspots of highly cited papers from 2009 to 2018. The results showed that China’s highly cited papers had been ranked first in the world, but judging from the total cited times and average cited times, the influence and quality of Chinese papers still lagged far behind that of the United States. China’s influence in the formation of international science and technology cooperation network was also far less than that of the United States. Among the top 20 research institutes with highly cited papers, Chinese institutes had occupied the largest number of seats, reaching five seats, but each of them had the phenomenon of low total cited times and average cited times. At present, the development of food science shows a trend of interdisciplinary integration, and the research hotspots around the world mainly focus on the bioactivity and mechanism of food effective components, new nutrient delivery systems (microcapsules, nanocapsules and emulsion systems), intestinal microbes, stability of ingredients, food packaging and shelf life. The research fields between China and the USA, as well as China’s five superiority research institutions, are distinctive and distinctly different.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘彬;陈柳;.食品科学高被引论文计量分析[J].中国食品学报,2020,20(5):308-318

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-05-28
  • 出版日期:
版权所有 :《中国食品学报》杂志社     京ICP备09084417号-4
地址 :北京市海淀区阜成路北三街8号9层      邮政编码 :100048
电话 :010-65223596 65265375      电子邮箱 :chinaspxb@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

漂浮通知