市售人造肉饼食用品质评价
作者:
作者单位:

(1.上海交通大学农业与生物学院食品科学与工程系 上海 200240;2.南京农业大学食品科技学院 南京 210095)

作者简介:

汪梦妮(1996—),女,硕士生

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31901816)


Edible Qualities Evaluation of the Commercial Artificial Meat Patties
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture & Biology,Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240;2.College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探究市场上植物蛋白肉与传统肉制品食用品质的差异性。方法:选取两种牛肉风味人造肉饼与一种传统牛肉饼,采用色差仪、质构仪测定其颜色与质构指标;以电子鼻测定挥发性风味轮廓;以氨基酸自动分析仪测定游离氨基酸含量;以选择适合项目法(CATA)测定感官属性的特征;以问卷调查消费者对人造肉的接受度。结果:人造肉饼与传统牛肉饼相比,亮度更低,红度更高(P<0.05);硬度、弹性、咀嚼性都显著低于传统牛肉饼(P<0.05);3种肉饼的香味轮廓可被电子鼻快速区分;在3种肉饼中分别检出游离氨基酸16,15,15种,人造肉饼总游离氨基酸含量更高,牛肉饼的氨基酸组成模式更好。CATA试验表明:牛肉饼偏褐色,质地较松散,腥味以及脂肪味更加明显;人造肉饼偏红色,质地较柔软和紧实,烤肉风味和黑椒风味更明显。问卷调查结果显示:感官消费者对植物蛋白肉的接受程度更高。结论:本研究为植物蛋白肉的食用品质改进提供参考。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the different edible qualities between the plant-based and the traditional meat products, two types of beef-flavored artificial meat patties and one traditional beef patties were selected, and their color, texture, flavor, and sensory properties were analyzed. In the experiment, color difference meter and texture analyzer were used to measure the color and texture properties, respectively. Electronic nose(E-nose) was used to measure the volatile flavor profiles. Free amino acids were detected by automatic amino acid analyzer. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) was used to characterize their sensory profiles. A survey was conduct to investigate consumers' acceptance towards artificial meat. The results showed that artificial meat patties had lower brightness but higher redness (P<0.05). Their hardness, elasticity, and chewiness were significantly lower than the traditional one(P<0.05). E-nose could quickly distinguish the volatile profiles of three different brands of meat patties though linear discriminant analysis(LDA). The results showed that 16, 15, and 15 kinds of free amino acids were isolated from three different meat patties, and 7 kinds of essential amino acids were detected. The total free amino acid content of artificial meat patties was higher, and the amino acid composition pattern of beef patties was better. The flavoring amino acids of artificial meat patties contribute more to umami and sweetness, and the flavoring amino acids of beef patties contribute more bitterness. CATA results showed beef patties were brownish, lower cohesiveness in texture with more fatty and meaty smell. Artificial meat patties were reddish, softer and tighter in texture with roasted meat and black pepper smell. Both of them were favored by consumers. The survey showed consumers preferred plant-based meat. This research provides a practical way for the improvement of the plant-based meat.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

汪梦妮,李文倩,彭金月,刘源,陈艳萍.市售人造肉饼食用品质评价[J].中国食品学报,2022,22(4):318-329

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
版权所有 :《中国食品学报》杂志社     京ICP备09084417号-4
地址 :北京市海淀区阜成路北三街8号9层      邮政编码 :100048
电话 :010-65223596 65265375      电子邮箱 :chinaspxb@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

漂浮通知


×
《中国食品学报》杂志社招聘编辑