不同烤制时间的鸡翅理化指标及风味物质组成差异
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.北京工商大学轻工科学与工程学院 食品与健康学院 北京 100048;2.广东美的厨房电器制造有限公司 广东佛山 528311)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(32372462);北京市自然科学基金面上项目(6172004)


Differences in Physicochemical Characteristics and Volatile Flavor Composition for Roasted Chicken Wings at Different Roasting Times
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, School of Food and Health,Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048;2.Guangdong Midea Kitchen Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Foshan 528311, Guangdong)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究烤制时间对电烤箱烤鸡翅品质和风味的影响,对分别烤制16,18,20 min的 3个鸡翅样品进行感官评价、脂肪酸、氨基酸、硫代巴比妥酸反应物、蛋白羰基含量、挥发性风味物质分析。结果表明:烤制时间延长,脂肪酸含量先由13.00 mg/g增加到17.41 mg/g,再减少到10.52 mg/g,氨基酸含量从10.60 g/100 g增长到11.71 g/100 g再减少到10.8 g/100 g,硫代巴比妥酸值从1.71 mg/kg升到4.73 mg/kg,蛋白质羰基含量值从7.69 nmol/mg增加到15.61 nmol/mg。相比之下,18 min烤鸡翅的感官风味及营养指标(多不饱和脂肪酸占比36.01%、必需氨基酸占比43.38%)最好。采用溶剂辅助蒸发/气相色谱-质谱分析鉴定出108个挥发性化合物,正交偏最小二乘判别分析显示来源于美拉德反应的乙偶姻、四氢吡喃-2-酮、4-羟基丁酸、1-羟基-2-丙酮等和来源于脂质氧化反应的己醛、壬醛、戊醛、(Z)-2-癸烯醛、(E,E)-2,4-癸二烯醛、庚醛、2,3-辛二酮等化合物为构成3个样品挥发性组成差异的重要化合物。稀释法/气相色谱-嗅闻分析共鉴定出56个气味活性物质,烤18 min鸡翅鉴定出的化合物数量最多。3个样品中稀释因子大(log2FD≥6)的共同化合物包括3-(甲硫基)丙醛、己醛、(E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛、癸醛、(E)-2-壬烯醛、(E)-2-十一烯醛、(E,E)-2,4-癸二烯醛、4,5-环氧-2(E)-癸烯醛、1-辛烯-3-酮、2-壬酮。正交偏最小二乘判别分析,显示来源于美拉德反应的2-甲基丁醛、2,3-丁二酮、糠醛、3-(甲硫基)丙醛、二甲基二硫醚、2-甲基-3-呋喃硫醇、2,5-二甲基吡嗪等12个化合物和来源于脂质氧化反应的庚醛、反-2-己烯醛、(E)-2-癸烯醛、(E,E)-2,4-壬二烯醛、辛醛、己醛、4,5-环氧-2(E)-癸烯醛等14个化合物为构成3个样品气味活性化合物组成差异的重要化合物。研究结果为获得较佳的烤鸡翅产品的工艺选择提供参考。

    Abstract:

    To explore the effect of roasting time on quality and flavor of the roasted chicken wings, three chicken wing samples roasted in electric oven for 16, 18, and 20 minutes were analyzed by sensory evaluation and determination of fatty acids and amino acids, thiobarbituric acid reaction substances (TBARS), protein carbonyl content, and volatile flavor composition. The results showed that with the extension roasting time, the fatty acid content first increased from 13.00 to 17.41 mg/g and then decreased to 10.52 mg/g. The amino acid content first increased from 10.60 to 11.71 g/100 g and then decreased to 10.8 g/100 g. The TBARS value increased from 1.71 to 4.73 mg/kg, and the protein carbonyl content increased from 7.69 to 15.61 nmol/mg. In contrast, the chicken wings roasted for 18 min possessed the best sensory flavor and the optimal nutritional indexes, represented by 36.01% of polyunsaturated fatty acids and 43.38% of essential amino acids among total. In comparsion, the chicken wings roasted for 18 minutes possessed the best sensory flavor and optimal nutritional indexes indicated by the percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids in total fatty acids and that of essential amino acids in total amino acids. A total of 108 volatile compounds were identified using solvent assisted flavor evaporation/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (SAFE/GC-MS). Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) according to VIP>1 (variable importance projection above 1) showed that acetoin, tetrahydropyran-2-one, 4-hydroxybutyric acid, 1-hydroxy-2-acetone, etc. formed from the Maillard reaction, and hexanal, nonanal, pentanal, (Z)-2-decenal, (E,E)-2,4-decadienal, heptanal, 2,3-octedione, etc. formed from the lipid oxidation played significant roles in differentiation of volatile compositions of the three samples. SAFE combined with aroma extract dilution analysis/gas chromatography-olfactometry analysis (SAFE/AEDA/GC-MS) identified 56 odor active compounds in the three samples, while the 18 minute-roasted chicken wings had the highest number. Those with high dilution factors (log2FD≥6) in common in the three samples included 3-(methylthio)propanal, hexanal, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, decanal, (E)-2-nonenal, (E)-2-undecenal, (E,E)-2,4-decedienal, 4,5-epoxy-2(E)-decanal, 1-octen-3-one, and 2-nonenone. OPLS-DA analysis according to (VIP>1) showed that 12 compounds via the Maillard reaction, including 2-methylbutanal, 3-methylbutanal, 2,3-butanedione, furfural, 3-(methylthio)propanal, dimethyl disulfide, 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, etc. and 14 compounds via the lipid oxidation, including heptanal, propenal, trans-2-hexenal, (E)-2-decenal, (E,E)-2,4-nonadienal, octanal, hexanal, 4,5-epoxy-2(E)-decenenal, etc. played key roles in differentiation of compositions of the odor active compounds of the three samples. The work can provide guidance to select cooking technologies for roasted chicken wings with an optimal quality and flavor.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王璇,胡晴晴,何金鑫,裴昭阳,徐玉霞,王金花,谢建春.不同烤制时间的鸡翅理化指标及风味物质组成差异[J].中国食品学报,2024,24(12):414-431

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-09
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
版权所有 :《中国食品学报》杂志社     京ICP备09084417号-4
地址 :北京市海淀区阜成路北三街8号9层      邮政编码 :100048
电话 :010-65223596 65265375      电子邮箱 :chinaspxb@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

漂浮通知


×
《中国食品学报》杂志社招聘编辑